Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2024 at 12:04:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Montages (Multiple images shown side-by-side)
- Info created & uploaded by Alvesgaspar - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 18:55:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Others
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 14:05:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Earth
- Info One of the first images taken by humans of the whole Earth. Photographed by the crew of Apollo 8 (probably by Bill Anders) the photo shows the Earth at a distance of about 30,000 km. North is at the top, with South America visible at the covering the bottom half center, with Africa entering into shadow. North America is at the top left. Created by NASA - uploaded by Aaron1a12 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 14:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 14:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Wolverine XI 16:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 12:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 13:48:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others (It is a combination of light painting and ICM)
- Info created and uploaded by Ibirapuera - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 13:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 13:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info created by Ghrkya - uploaded by Ghrkya - nominated by Ghrkya -- Ghrkya (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support This picture was taken during the Spring Festival(or known as the Lunar New Year),and shows the yearly light show on the Xi'an city wall,which is the only well-protected city wall in China.I chose the main door of the city wall-Yong-Ning Men to record that(the whole city wall is too long to be taken).I believe this picutre can perfectly show the situation when Chinese people celebrate the Spring Festival. -- Ghrkya (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 11:33:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#others
- Info CGI of a historical classroom, created by Christophe Seux – uploaded+rendered by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I find the map disturbing - Europe at the present time with a German Empire? Do we want this as a FI? I am not sure. The missing L is less problematic, this is a typical glitch. --Kritzolina (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info Well, I think it is on purpose, as it represents a historical scene back then (maybe 1900s or 1910s, where electricity should already be in use). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- (As a funny story) My school also had "present maps" with the Sowjet Union and so on :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I read it as a room from the 1950s or 1960s - but yes, the information what time it is supposed to be representing would be helpful. Kritzolina (talk) 06:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- (As a funny story) My school also had "present maps" with the Sowjet Union and so on :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose That was something 10 years ago. But today? Dull light, nothing special. Yann (talk) 18:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I don't have a ready opinion about AI-generated images. ★ 01:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info It's not AI generated --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 06:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info The letter "L" is missing :-) -- -donald- (talk) 04:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2024 at 04:24:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
- Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zzzs (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful golden light, good-looking head -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 20:31:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Ostraciidae
- Info Reticulate boxfish (Ostracion solorensis), Anilao, Philippines. This boxfish is native to the western Pacific Ocean and can grow to 12 centimetres (4.7 in) in length. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Ostracion. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Basile Morin: Brigthened Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Вид на вершину МЮД и на ледник Колесника из цирка Ледника Туристов, верховья Левого Талгара.jpg
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 18:43:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
- Info created and uploaded by Assylkhan.abdrakhmanov - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 18:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 18:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful scene, well captured! --Kritzolina (talk) 13:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice scene, but sharpness is not good enough for FP --Milseburg (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 13:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another image I was going to nominate --Zzzs (talk) 13:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sunshine in blue sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Underexposured. Crop some sky above. --Mile (talk) 11:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- The exposure seems OK, but let's see what others say. I will not crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 11:39:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
- Info created by Felinlove - uploaded by Felinlove - nominated by Felinlove -- Felinlove (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Felinlove (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
There's a halo around the animal.Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)- @Charlesjsharp You are right. There was a slight one. I uploaded a new version with the correction. Felinlove (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please fix the license in EXIF. -ND/NC licenses are not acceptable on Commons. Yann (talk) 13:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Done! Felinlove (talk) 17:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition. Yann (talk) 20:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:20, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 08:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family:Libellulidae
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You might want to have a look at other dragonfly QIs/FPs. The abdomen should all be in focus. Blown highlights too. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I note for the abdomen for future shots, thank you :) Skander zarrad (talk) 15:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 06:37:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info King Frederik X and Queen Mary of Denmark on a state visit to Sweden in May 2024. They arrive with the barge Vasaorden across Saltsjön from the Danish royal yacht Dannebrog and disembark at the Logård Stairs at Stockholm Palace where the Swedish royal couple receive. A old and traditional way of receiving heads of state arriving by sea. Same ceremony 1897. It was King Frederik X’s first State Visit following his accession to the throne in January, and the first incoming State Visit from Denmark since 1985.
- Created and uploaded by Frankie Fouganthin - nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 06:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 06:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 18:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 11:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Solemn mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 04:53:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Papaveraceae
- Info Half-opened flower bud of a Meconopsis cambrica, Welsh poppy. Focus stack of 52 photos. The delicate almost translucent petals of a Meconopsis cambrica.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 18:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see what's special about it, the lighting makes it look flat Henrysz (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special enough for me. Wolverine XI 16:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Assuming the background is natural. Special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The background is pure nature. The photo was taken in morning light (23 Jun 2024 06:31).--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 00:03:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1950-1959
- Info Marilyn Monroe in 1953 as she appears on December 1953 issue of Photoplay magazine. Created by studio publicity still - uploaded by Lemonreader - nominated by ★ -- ★ 00:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Classy, chic, iconic… -- ★ 00:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral FFT should be improved from the original --Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This is not how she appeared on the Photoplay cover. This is a poorly cropped, distorted and retouched (undisclosed) version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: Please fix your signature. Yann (talk) 12:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yann (talk) 13:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Lemonreader: Quality is very good, I tend towards supporting, but I would like more information about how you got this image. As Charles says above, this is not a copy of the magazine cover. Yann (talk) 12:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 14:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Could you please stop nominating and withdrawing every 2 days? In this specific case, as I said, the quality is quite good, but we need more information how this image was created/restored, etc. Yann (talk) 18:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2024 at 00:02:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
- Info Tomb of Luís de Camões at the Jerónimos Monastery, Lisbon, Portugal. Created by xiquinhosilva - uploaded by Tm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 00:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 00:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Renomination of course. ★ 13:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 23:54:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
- Info created by Slim Alileche - uploaded by Slim Alileche - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 23:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 23:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, bad light. I don't think it's fixable -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose HDR could have helped here -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose (regretfully) – poor lighting. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 19:59:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Tetraodontiformes
- Info Redtoothed triggerfish (Odonus niger), Anilao, Philippines. The redtoothed triggerfish species is usually 50 centimetres (20 in) long and live in the widespread Indo-Pacific Ocean and Red Sea in a depth between 3–35 metres (9.8–114.8 ft). The normally feed on zooplankton or sponges. They are also known to be carnivorous and can eat many different types of animals such as krill, clams, squid, urchins, and small fish. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Odonus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 22:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for an underwater picture, and striking color -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition and colour in an underwater photo. --Tagooty (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support For a fish named triggerfish, there is nothing triggering about it. --Zzzs (talk) 03:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support The electric blue color that stands out against the dark background is remarkable. --Terragio67 (talk) 03:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Btw, I have to add that what makes this pictures special to me is the pose with the open mouth, that's really rare to see. Poco a poco (talk) 06:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment very nice, but slightly too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool fish! Wolverine XI 16:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 12:45:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 12:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 12:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Like the last one, the portrait doesn't work. Wolverine XI 20:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The long stick is interesting. Please add the {{PR}} template on the pictures featuring people -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 20:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 04:41:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
- Info No landscape FP from South Korea. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The sadness of the photo grabs my throat. I also don't know what to look for. There is no path, there are no visible mountains. Only living and dead shrubs in the foreground.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 04:37:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#South Korea
- Info No bridge FP from South Korea. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support but the stairs on the right are very prominent. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it is intentional, since they are old stone stairs, and I like the grass on them. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not bad. Wolverine XI 20:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The stairs in the foreground dominate. A different viewpoint or crop that emphasises the bridge would be better. --Tagooty (talk) 01:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tagooty. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 02:16:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Info Last nomination was a brief appearance on here before I realised it was the third of three open nominations. Whoops! Now that one of those two have closed, renominating. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 18:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 01:13:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
- Info created by Otávio Nogueira - uploaded by User:KwisatzH - nominated by KwisatzH -- KwisatzH (talk) 01:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- KwisatzH (talk) 01:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Burnt sky and harsh light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin Could you explain better, please? Do you like this photo more? KwisatzH (talk) 05:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see the point of shooting at 1/2,000 sec using f/1.7 for landscapes in both versions, and the composition of this one does not satisfy me, but yes, the sky is slightly better. Blown hightlights in the nominated version -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin (1, 2, 3.) Does the composition of some of these photos satisfy you? I can propose an alternative. KwisatzH (talk) 05:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Horse and man are out of focus in File:Interior das aguas (53250371501).jpg because the small F-number creates a narrow depth of field. Compare with the water in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin (1, 2, 3.) Does the composition of some of these photos satisfy you? I can propose an alternative. KwisatzH (talk) 05:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see the point of shooting at 1/2,000 sec using f/1.7 for landscapes in both versions, and the composition of this one does not satisfy me, but yes, the sky is slightly better. Blown hightlights in the nominated version -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile Morin -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This is not going to pass. --Zzzs (talk) 02:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: See Basile Morin's comment | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 17:56:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
- Info Advection fog forms as warmer, moist air moves over a cold ground. It is most common on winters near the Tuscan-Romagnolo valleys, as they are not far from the Adriatic Sea. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene, but level of detail is disappointing in full resolution. --Milseburg (talk) 20:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp. Wolverine XI 21:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Very nice scene but the quality is not great El Golli Mohamed 22:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 15:03:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
- Info Lonely fishermen crossing the Doce River under the sunset. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 15:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The main subject (assumed by the file name) is too small --Zzzs (talk) 16:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Zzzs: do you suggest a crop? ★ 16:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- If the crop works, I'm fine with it. Zzzs (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Zzzs: do you suggest a crop? ★ 16:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Please choose one, and do not create 2 alternatives. Yann (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. ★ 19:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- @Zzzs: Cropped using the rule of thirds. ★ 16:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Mobile phone cameras are not very good in dark environments. Low quality, and relatively small resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is missing. Wolverine XI 20:38, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 00:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 10:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
- Info Belgrade Waterfront, view to Sava River from shoping center Galerija. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Some very strange distortions on water, sky, people etc. - was it taken through glass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Well distiortions, banding, strange reflextins in sky are result of glass, cant you see its glass window in front. Glass buidling. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I assumed it was; that's explains it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --August Geyler (talk) 17:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting and eye-catching presentation of this view. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --skander zarrad (talk) 08:33, 01 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:02, 01 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:10, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2024 at 09:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Poales
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 09:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question What about a small cw rotation? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can rotate the image, but it is not correct. There is hilly terrain and the image is correct as it is. --XRay 💬 16:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- We don't see the hill, that's why you should rotate the horizon El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I can rotate the image, but it is not correct. There is hilly terrain and the image is correct as it is. --XRay 💬 16:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support But needs a rotation El Golli Mohamed 15:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love the fact that the sun is not in focus. Wolverine XI 21:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 02:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SpokenClaw (talk) 02:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Did you use a lens filter? (I'm just curious...) --Terragio67 (talk) 16:05, 01 July 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't used a filter, just the pure lens. --XRay 💬 16:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- thanks. Terragio67 (talk) 16:43, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't used a filter, just the pure lens. --XRay 💬 16:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment please don't forget to rotate the image. The horizon must be horizontal --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:36, 03 July 2024 (UTC)
- I am happy to rotate the image. However, I don't know what it should look like. The background and thus the horizon are not horizontal, as it is a hilly terrain that slopes to the left. Should I straighten the horizon and thus distort the image? --XRay 💬 09:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 19:41:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support You outdid yourself with this one; what a shot! Wolverine XI 19:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --Zzzs (talk) 20:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose But crop is weird, position of head in the middle.--Mile (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't like the suggested crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Appealing weather and the composition is fine in my view. The monkey is oriented to the right, so lead room to that direction makes sense -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support More than weird it looks unusual. Several portraits done by famous Dutch painters and late Renaissance painters, have this kind of creative posture. Unknowingly, or not, you have performed a particular and in my opinion valid crop. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:16, 01 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 09:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Sweden
- Info Helgumannen is a fishing station near the nature reserve of Langhammars at Fårö island (Gotland, Sweden). Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too far. Wolverine XI 19:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just some info about this place. Fårö is known worldwide for its stark, desolate and minimalist limestone beaches. This photo captures that perfectly with the simple fishing huts and one lone person. This is where Ingmar Bergman lived and made many of his films. He came to the island when he was scouting for locations, fell in love with the place and stayed the rest of his life. This is about as quintessential Fårö as you can get in a photo. --Cart (talk) 21:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support agree with Cart. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the photo exudes a certain loneliness, partly thanks to the woman on the left.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 05:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral To be honest, the composition doesn't appeal to me. The horizon in the middle and too many empty spaces are not advantageous. --XRay 💬 09:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question 2x4 crop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Too much foreground and background. A crop would give value to your beautiful photo. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:26, 01 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 05:04:08
- Info created by RaiyaniM - uploaded by RaiyaniM - (Original nomination)
Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
- Delist -- There were well-reasoned opposes at the last FPC. I'm not sure how this one got by. Photos need to be sharp! ( Schierbecker (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep --Yann (talk) 10:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Wow > Sharpness. Period. ★ 10:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The wow replaces the quality in this image (I learned the hard way). This is FP, not QI. --Zzzs (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- Karelj (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist "Wow"—however you define it—is not everything. Wolverine XI 19:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Zzzs. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It makes no sense that people are here saying wow outweighs sharpness but in nominations it's the opposite Henrysz (talk) 20:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- The wow also outweighed the sharpness in the nomination, with a ratio of 10 to 4. Zzzs (talk) 02:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 04:48:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2000-2009
- Info created by Andy Dunaway/U.S. Army - uploaded and nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- It doesn't get more "danger close" than this. Schierbecker (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I will not support a photo showing a bombing killing humans. The atrocious images in the news are already unbearable. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- The fact that this image was nominated in the first place is mind-boggling. Wolverine XI 19:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with El Golli Mohamed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I know we also have other grizzly images (not linking them now because I want to have a good night's sleep) and stuff, but this is too far. I'm not going to examine the details of this image for quality, but this nomination is unethical. --Zzzs (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The problem of this picture is not the subject. Visit the top prizes of photojournalist competitions in famous newspapers and you will find many striking images of this kind. Also in wildlife. COM:FPC is not a care bears platform, and fortunately we have already promoted several FPs of bombings (example) in the past. But here, the quality, the wow factor and the light are not exceptional in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but atomic bomb tests killed people indirectly through radiation sickness not well understood at the time. It may not be relevant, but the nominator is a great admirer of US Armed Forces. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- FPC guidelines: "The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensation" -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- And the vote takes into account the context of the observer. Given that the nominator is a great admirer of the US Armes Forces, I don't really think that he wants to evoke rejection or sadness through his image. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Having a user on Commons who has a special interest in military matters is useful. That means he can dig through piles of such images for the best ones and nominate them here, and we don't need to see all those depressing images. --Cart (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- The nominator is not the photographer. All the countries of the world have army and weapons. The nominator is also a cyclist, a cat lover, and so what? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- And the vote takes into account the context of the observer. Given that the nominator is a great admirer of the US Armes Forces, I don't really think that he wants to evoke rejection or sadness through his image. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 14:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- FPC guidelines: "The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensation" -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but atomic bomb tests killed people indirectly through radiation sickness not well understood at the time. It may not be relevant, but the nominator is a great admirer of US Armed Forces. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose also per Basile. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 14:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I come back to my old standpoint that a really good encyclopedia needs good images for all articles, however distasteful they are, not just cute or nice things. Cruelties need to be shown correctly too. This photo is good in that it shows how bleak, colorless and depressing this kind of destruction is. Compare with what the news show from Gaza and Ukraine. Unfortunately, most of us have been brainwashed by movies and games to think that war should look "exciting" like this: Hollywood version. --Cart (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I will vote for this image as a VI to illustrate articles but not as FP with a "wow" of admiration. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think anyone here would vote in admiration of this. There can also be a "wow" in the very accuracy of an image. There is a language barrier here in thinking that "wow" is only defined in a positive way. There can also be "wow" for the skill off the photographer to capture something difficult very accurately. "Wow" is the ability for a photo to evoke emotion (good or bad) in the viewer. --Cart (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- You misunderstand the meaning of Wow Cart. Unwise for a Swede to lecture a Tunisian. I agree with what El Golli Mohamed wrote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn't speaking about "wow" according to Encyclopædia Britannica, but as used in the FPC guidelines as quoted by Basile earlier in this discussion. For years now, we've abridged that long sentence into the short word "wow". Whatever nationality we have, we are all WikiMedians. Right? --Cart (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- You misunderstand the meaning of Wow Cart. Unwise for a Swede to lecture a Tunisian. I agree with what El Golli Mohamed wrote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think anyone here would vote in admiration of this. There can also be a "wow" in the very accuracy of an image. There is a language barrier here in thinking that "wow" is only defined in a positive way. There can also be "wow" for the skill off the photographer to capture something difficult very accurately. "Wow" is the ability for a photo to evoke emotion (good or bad) in the viewer. --Cart (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose While there is merit in having disturbing images on Commons, I see no reason to feature this image. BTW, the claims made in the caption of the image are not verifiable by Wikimedians and may be false. --Tagooty (talk) 02:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, the claims that it was a torture house etc. must be reliably sourced or deleted @Schierbecker: . Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2024 at 04:33:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands Groningen.
- Info Waterfall. Location, Chinese garden, the Hidden Realm of Ming in the Hortus Haren in the Netherlands. Belichtingstijd 8/1 sec (8) F-getal f/7,1 ISO/ASA-waarde 100
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
NeutralNumerous chromatic aberrations at the top of the image, but I could be wrong since I'm not a professional. --Zzzs (talk) 12:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)- Support CAs gone, redo vote --Zzzs (talk) 21:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. chromatic aberration resolved. Thanks for the review.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support given the CAs have been removed. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would crop the sky above.--Mile (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Do you mean, remove all the air or a small strip?--Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Something like that in note, i think it is better. --Mile (talk) 07:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. I'll take it into consideration.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Nice image. Just an idea: Use a short flash during the long exposure. So you can see some water drops. --XRay 💬 09:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support The bottom part compensate the top one. -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 22:22:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support crisp. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:50, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful birdie. Wolverine XI 16:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 21:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:11, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We don't need two so similar. If you prefer this one, can I suggest you nominate your exisitng FP for deletion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, it is a different image and in many cases we find in the FP galleries several FP images of the same species.. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:19, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderfully pretty. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 17:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family : Strophariaceae
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Gallery? --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, fixed. --Plozessor (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: very busy composition, but it works somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per The Cosmonaut. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 17:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info created by White Studio - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Plozessor (talk) 18:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 10:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Rosaceae
- Info created and uploaded by Dots foto - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 10:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: beautiful scene, but there are a few technical issues: the sky is a bit noisy and has a couple of dust spots, while the whole image is very tilted to the right. Would support if these are corrected. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There is also a halo effect around the tree. --C messier (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut and C messier: I've fixed the tilt and a bit of noise but halo left me confused — maybe I'm stupid or it's my colour blidnness kicking in, but I don't see any. Красный wanna talk? 19:33, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The parts of the image around and especially below (between the foliage and the ground) the tree are unnaturally bright. --C messier (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested version @Красный, The Cosmonaut, and C messier: Dear reviewers, I have reduced the slight halo in the treetop and then adjusted the overall tonal correction accordingly. If you like the result, you can use this edit for an update. Please see the SwissTransfer link. While editing, I realized that the glow in the treetop might have been due to some overly well-intentioned post-processing. But that's just my guess. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good for me, but I'm still not sure about the halo. I just don't see it. Красный wanna talk? 21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think the halo mentioned by our fellow photographer C messier refers to the glow of the treetop that I removed in my suggestion. This can be clearly seen in a direct comparison of the two versions. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- The sky looks better, but the houses are still leaning to the right. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed, like other uploads by the same author. Kind of vignetting. The center has been lightened -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very well composed. --August Geyler (talk) 17:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good, but the dull light is spoils it for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Milsenburg. -- Karelj (talk) 09:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
- Info The church of Agios Menas, Fira, Santorini. All by C messier. -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- C messier (talk) 09:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Tilted? Yann (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Sky a little bit grainy, very minor CAs. --XRay 💬 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 09:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}Sorry, but maybe this one: File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Pareronia avatar (Moore, 1858) - Pale Wanderer.jpg presents more realistic colors of the same butterfly. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)- Comment I don't think is FP quality, but there doesn't seem to be any issue with the colour of this male Harlock81. It seems that this butterfly shows colour-variation, possibly seasonal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- My mistake, I thought the two pictures were taken at the same place, the same day. Thanks for pinging me --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is good but not exceptional, composition is routine compared to FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, furthermore the environment is not so appealing Poco a poco (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2024 at 03:30:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: aerial view of west Faial taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 14:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Can't find any "wow" in this image. --Zzzs (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Oustanding for a common plane-shot --Milseburg (talk) 20:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It might have been a very impressive view. Probably everyone has ever visited the world through the window of a plane, and thought "wow, these illuminated clouds are so dreamy from above". Unfortunately, the pictures are seldom extraordinary, due to the thick layers of glass between the camera and the subject. Hazy landscape in that case, and dull colors are probably the result of the material. Hot air balloons are more convenient, and some drones sometimes that can fly high -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Why offer impossible alternatives? There are no hot air balloon operators in the Azores, and the maximum drone flight height in Portugal is legally limited to 120 m. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Helicopter? Airship? Parachute jump? Jet pack? Flyboard Air? See these alternatives as general cases and potential solutions to get around the problem of the large glass barrier of the plane window -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, and one can try levitation if nothing else works. Alternatively, we can accept the fact that under some circumstances, shoooting through the glass is fine. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- But you admitted that the quality of your image was "not ideal".
- If you practice levitation, I would suggest to choose a special moment of the day like golden hour or sunrise :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Of course it's never ideal to shoot through the glass. That's why the context in which an image is taken is important. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry but the context was certainly not a photo session. Most probably transportation. Like when you shoot from a train, it's difficult too -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sure there are some photos that can only be reasonably obtained from a train, with associated drop in technical quality. And that's exactly what context is. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 16:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Orthoptera
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice camouflage! ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support LGTM --Zzzs (talk) 04:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 12:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Of course… ★ 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good image and certainly QI/VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 14:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Appealing light and fair composition, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per GRDN711 --Tagooty (talk) 01:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per GRDN711 -- Karelj (talk) 10:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 07:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family:Amaryllidaceae (Allium roseum)
- Info created by Smailtn - uploaded by Smailtn - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support pleasant view --Mile (talk) 19:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 05:56:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info Gephan range towering (elev. 8,000 ft (2,400 m)) above the Bhaga river, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support A great landscape for me --Famberhorst (talk) 12:21, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The light is not so good, for "one of the best pictures of the site". Hazy. The shadows are too dominant in the mountains, especially at the left. Harsh light. It's almost a contrejour, since the shadows seem to be leaning in our direction. Incidentally lack of sharpness in the corners -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Thanks for your comments. I have tweaked the exposure and shadows, plus mild sharpening. Is it better? Note that the direction is to the south, the sun is shining out of the top left corner. At high altitude, lighting tends to be harsh owing to the clear air. Tagooty (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Sorry, my edits accidentally got undone before export from LR. The latest version now has the exposure and sharpness adjustments. Please review this. Tagooty (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Minor change. I don't see much improvement, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure you've uploaded the correct file? I honestly see no difference at all, even looking carefully at full size. Although they seem to be different files in megabytes. So I wonder what has changed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 14:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --Kadellar (talk) 09:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2024 at 01:25:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info The final room of the "Camp: Notes on Fashion" exhibit at The Met in 2019. At this point in the exhibit, the narrow corridors open up to this large, two-floor spectacle of wild ensembles. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 01:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 09:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Faial Caldera panorama3.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 00:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Faial Caldera, Azores. Better shadows compared to the previous nomination; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 14:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 00:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 22:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
- Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The striking male violet-backed starling is already an FP. I don't think the plain female merits FP. --Tagooty (talk) 06:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- I feel that the FP bars for many subjects are getting lower over the past 2-3 years. I wonder how many reviewers compare with FPs in the gallery before voting? Perhaps, its just that I'm getting older and more critical! Tagooty (talk) 03:25, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I agree the setting is not exceptional. Perhaps the FP bar should be raised; as long as there is consensus. We are promoting dozens of unexeptional small brown birds standing on brown earth or sand these days. Thinking about consistency, what do you think about the recent nominations of the white butterfly and brown locust? Neither are rare species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: An FP is one "of the finest on Commons". The violet-backed starling is common throughout Africa. Your FP of the strikingly-coloured male has set a high bar. An unexceptional image of a drab female does not cross the bar IMO. I would support an unusual image of a plain brown bird, or an image of a rare brown bird. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might have to oppose many bird more bird FPs, Tagooty, if you don't like little brown birds and females. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- An FP is an extraordinary image with wow-factor. This image does not have an unusual pose/activity/colouration/etc that catches my attention. It merits QI and VI. --Tagooty (talk) 08:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Tagooty Why wouldn't it? It would be fair if the other gender is a FP, like many others. Zzzs (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sat 29 Jun → Thu 04 Jul Sun 30 Jun → Fri 05 Jul Mon 01 Jul → Sat 06 Jul Tue 02 Jul → Sun 07 Jul Wed 03 Jul → Mon 08 Jul Thu 04 Jul → Tue 09 Jul
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Tue 25 Jun → Thu 04 Jul Wed 26 Jun → Fri 05 Jul Thu 27 Jun → Sat 06 Jul Fri 28 Jun → Sun 07 Jul Sat 29 Jun → Mon 08 Jul Sun 30 Jun → Tue 09 Jul Mon 01 Jul → Wed 10 Jul Tue 02 Jul → Thu 11 Jul Wed 03 Jul → Fri 12 Jul Thu 04 Jul → Sat 13 Jul
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.