User talk:Jordiferrer/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Igualada-Museo_de_la_Piel_(30).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Sita Murt.jpg was uncategorized on 1 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Masia-AmorFerrerMussonsGuardiola.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jezhotwells (talk) 22:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Explicacions en català
Hola jordiferrer, crec que ens coneixem de la viquipèdia. He vist que quan crees una categoria només hi afegeixes una explicació en anglès. Per què no la fas en català també? Wikimedia Commons està molt anglicitzat però és un contenidor general per a totes les viquipèdies, siguin en la llengua que siguin. I a més, sent tu català no entenc perquè no l'hi poses també, la explicació en català. Simplement és tenir en consideració la nostra llengua, de manera que no m'hagi de relegar a llegir-ho en anglès quan vingui aquí. Per cert, una altra cosa. Acostumat a afegir l'explicació amb la plantilla següent: {{ca|Explicació.}}, per l'anglès {{en|Explanation}} i per la resta de llengües amb el prefix corresponent. No t'ho prenguis malament, només són recomanacions. De totes maneres, endavant! Que he vist que has fet molt bona feina per aquí i enllaçant-ho des de la viquipèdia. --Catalaalatac (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Camp_Nou_-_Norman_Foster.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
– Adrignola talk 21:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Camp_Nou-_Norman_Foster-cropped.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
– Adrignola talk 21:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Castells
Ei Jordiferrer! M'agradaria crear una categoria que en català tinc molt clar que s'hauria de dir Category:Escuts de colles castelleres però en anglès no sé com se n'hauria de dir. Potser Category:Coats of arms of colles castelleres?? "Colla" em sembla intraduïble. Com creus que s'hauria de dir la categoria? A, per cert, fixa't que també he creat la Category:Pom de dalt, i amb temps n'aniré creant de les parts del castell. T'ho dic perquè ho sàpigues i perquè a partir d'ara no només categoritzis en funció de la colla de la foto, sinó també en funció del què s'hi veu: tan si és una pinya (només pinya), o es tracta del tronc o del pom de dalt, etc. Ara fa un parell de setmanes que amb uns amics ens hem apuntat als Castellers de Sabadell i ara hi tinc molt més d'interès. :) Moltes gràcies! Que vagi bé! Per cert, tu també estàs a alguna colla castellera? A quina? Apa, sort! --Catalaalatac 16:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Més cosetes...: Podries fer un cop d'ull a Category talk:Castellers? Hi he deixat unes quantes idees. --Catalaalatac (talk) 14:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Paco_Rabanne_perfume_-_Million.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 18:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Pregunta (cultural heritage)
Jo crec que sí que s'hauria de treure, com qualsevol altra categoria redundant. Ara bé, no sé com sentarà això als bots del concurs en català, que a diferència dels concursos estatals depèn de les categories per trobar les imatges. Aleshores, abans de començar a treure imatges de la categoria jo li preguntaria a en Vriullop per si de cas.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:41, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Sobre el bot
El bot comprueba que las imágenes no estén ya en una subcategoría, Añadió Category:Castell de Miralles porque es una categoría nueva y la lista de subcategorías la creé el día 4. Ya había tenido ese problema con otras categorías nuevas y había añadido unas cuantas a mano. Voy a regenerar la lista completa. Regenerada la lista de subcategorías de Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Catalonia -- Platonides (talk) 18:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Ben.MQ (talk) 11:43, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:29, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Fira de Barcelona
Compte amb la fira de Barcelona que ara té dos recintes. Un és a Sants-Montjuïc però l'altre és a l'Hospitalet. Aleshores la categoria de la fira i la del districte no poden ser redundants.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Potser ens simplificaria la feina fer una categoria per cada recinte.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Podem fer una categoria del recinte o dels edificis del recinte. A la llarga suposo que acabarem tenint les dues. La diferència són unes quantes fotos de fires que no són massa fotos d'edificis. Jo crec que començaria per les dels recintes, però tu mateix.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- No sé massa quin nom triaria. Guiant-me per la pàgina de la Fira [1] se m'ocorre "Gran Via venue" i "Montjuïc venue" (o "Montjuïc venue of Fira de Barcelona" si vols un títol més explicatiu). "Fira de Barcelona in Montjuïc" i "Fira de Barcelona in Gran Via" (o "in L'Hospitalet") també són una opció.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Podem fer una categoria del recinte o dels edificis del recinte. A la llarga suposo que acabarem tenint les dues. La diferència són unes quantes fotos de fires que no són massa fotos d'edificis. Jo crec que començaria per les dels recintes, però tu mateix.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Tallers 11
La veritat és que hauríem de buscar una manera estandarditzada d'anomenar aquesta mena de categories. Davant la manca d'una guia vaig tirar pel dret i vaig anar a la versió més senzilla, sense incloure "Edifici d'habitatges a ..." ni res semblant. El posar desambiguacions no ho acabo de veure clar. De fet, alguns dels reanomenaments que heu estat fent darrerament, amb desambiguacions de l'estil Eixample (Barcelona) o Ciutat Vella (Barcelona) no les veig gaire necessàries si no és que estaven provocant que es classifiquessin imatges erròniament. Crec que Tallers 11 és gairebé tan obscur com Tallers 11 (Barcelona), i dubto que a qualsevol dels dos llocs hi vagi a parar ningú per equivocació. Si volguéssim fer-ho més clar per tothom, més que canviar els noms de les categories, crec que hauríem de començar per traduir les descripcions de categories i fitxers (cosa que jo no estic fent, si més no aquest mes).--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- És difícil que un nom signifiqui alguna cosa, perquè tot el que cal per significar no sol cabre al nom. M'invento un exemple: "Xssrarkdsj (Cantonese XVII century onion and chicken soup)" pot tenir un significat, però "Xssrarkdsj (soup)", "Xssrarkdsj (Canton)", "Xssrarkdsj (onion and chicken)" o "Xssrarkdsj (17th century)" no en tenen massa significat per algú que no conegui el tema. Aleshores, tampoc veig que "Tallers 11 (Barcelona) informi gaire. Sí que informaria "Apartment building in 11th Tallers street (Barcelona)" o una cosa semblant, però ho veig molt poc pràctic. De fet, si algú arriba a la categoria Tallers 11 sense buscar-la, serà des d'una categoria on estigui continguda o des d'una imatge que hi sigui, i ja sabrà de què va.
- No sé si hi ha una norma o un costum establert a Commons.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Felicitats per la tasca que estàs fent per ordenar els arxius. Salut! Bestiasonica (talk) 16:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC) |
File:Nina Ricci design.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 21:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Silice
Careful translation of "silice" is not silicon but silica. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Re: Rotate needed ?
Replying to your question at User talk:84user#Rotate needed ? Please see Commons:Village pump#Autorotation using EXIF tag with MW 1.18. At the end of "Single cases" I asked whether {{Rotate}} is the best way to fix the problem images. As far as I can see that was the recommended way, but it does not seem ideal. -84user (talk) 07:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- See Commons:Village pump#rotate questions by 84user now. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:02, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Reverting
Hallo Jordiferrer, please do not revert without giving a reason in the summary. Reverting without reason should only happen in case of vandalism. Thank you for understanding that we need comments to work together as a community. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sita Murt.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sita Murt.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Kramer Associates (talk) 01:37, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
Dear Jordiferrer,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Reanomenar un fitxer
Bona nit Jordiferrer. En la imatge File:Ramón Folch i Camarasa.jpg hi ha un accent que no correspon. Hi ha alguna manera d'esborrar-lo? Gràcies. --Maltrobat (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Gràcies per la feina. Tindré en compte el tipus d'avís per fer-ho jo la pròxima vegada.--Maltrobat (talk) 06:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Categories en anglès
Hola, la política de noms de Commons es esta, on es diu que les categories s'han de nomenar en anglès preferentment. Sobre el Saló de Getxo et vaig contestar a la discussió, només és que no conec el nom correcte i preferisc no inventar-m'ho. Lobo (howl?) 01:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Re:Quality image
Les quality images són imatges molt bones tècnicament sense gaires mèrits més. Per les imatges de monuments fetes amb mitjans corrents crec que és molt més fàcil promoure-les a valued images. Fa temps, jo en vaig promoure un parell, que tampoc eren gran cosa, i van passar sense problemes, perquè només cal que sigui la millor (probablement la més útil) de les del mateix monument, o d'un aspecte del monument. L'única cosa que porta una mica de feina és que s'han de geolocalitzar abans de presentar-les.--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Suggereixo començar amb algun monument del que no hi hagi gaires imatges, o no gaires de representatives. Trobar la imatge més representativa de la façana de la passió o de les voltes de la Sagrada Família pot ser complicat.--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Compte que les imatges han d'estar geolocalitzades per ser VI. He geolocalitzat la de l'Amador i la d'en KRLS per si de cas a la votació diguessin que la d'en KRLS és més representativa.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:14, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Per cert, faltava afegir la nominació a la llista de candidats. Espero que ara no ens diguin que l'interès de l'edifici és massa local per ser un bon "scope" per les VI.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Main_Facade_of_Hospital_de_la_Santa_Creu_i_Sant_Pau has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casa Garriga, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Category:Castellfollit de Riubregós
He afegit imatges i endreçat la Category:Castellfollit de Riubregós. Algunes no estan descrites i les he repartit a vista. Si coneixes una mica el poble, pots fer un cop d'ull a les subcategories, que no hagi posat res fora de lloc?--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- El priorat de Santa Maria no és l'únic priorat del món dedicat a Santa Maria, ara bé:
- La gran majoria de priorats del món són fora del nostre àmbit, pel que no duran un nom en català i no es poden confondre amb aquest.
- L'altre priorat català notable dedicat a Santa Maria és el de Serrabona, però a diferència d'aquest aquell no l'he trobat enlloc anomenat com a "priorat de Santa Maria" a seques, de manera que no hi ha confusió possible. A més, la categoria ja existeix i té un nom diferent.
- Aleshores, jo crec que no cal posar la desambiguació al nom. Com a molt, hi posaria una nota de desambiguació per si algú es despista.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:18, 8 December 2011 (UTC)